Sussex Squash
Online League Management System 2025/2026Season


Section Rules
Mens Section

[Main] [Fixtures]
 

i-MASK advanced visor protection system for Squash. Can be worn over glasses and does not mist or restrict vision.
 
Weald
Club Address South Bank Hassocks West Sussex Post Code BN6 8JP Google Map
Download VCard
Telephone 01273 844283 Fax
Website http://www.the-weald.co.uk Email Weald
Club Fixtures Secretary Trevor Morgan Email

DIVISION TWO EAST - Weald IV (4) versus David Lloyd I (1) played on 02-Feb-2026 at 19:20

String Home Team Player Ranking Grading Away Team Player Ranking Grading Score Result
1 Julian Tate Squash Levels for Julian  Tate 19 (19) SL 3244 Stuart Penniket Squash Levels for Stuart  Penniket 2 (2) SL 2053 15-12 15-10 15-4 3-0
2 Tom Coley Squash Levels for Tom  Coley 20 (20) SL 3235 Mike Farrell Squash Levels for Mike  Farrell 3 (3) SL 2231 15-7 15-6 15-7 3-0
3 Olly BOOTLE Squash Levels for Olly  BOOTLE 21 (21) SL 2880 Richard Briggs Squash Levels for Richard  Briggs 7 (7) SL 2286 18-20 15-8 12-15 15-12 15-10 3-2
4 Patrick Knight Squash Levels for Patrick  Knight 23 (23) SL 2189 Jamie Crawford Squash Levels for Jamie  Crawford 4 (4) SL 1950 15-7 15-13 15-8 3-0
5 Julian Ward Squash Levels for Julian  Ward 24 (24) SL 2039 James Kearney Squash Levels for James  Kearney 9 (9) SL 1567 16-14 10-15 9-2 H 3-1
(U) - Unranked at time of match Home Team Away Team
Weald IV Beat David Lloyd I by Strings
5 0
Games
15 3
Win Bonus
5 0
League Organiser Adjustment
0 0
Points
20 3

Match Report Press Report

Weald IV Beat David Lloyd I in a one-sided match.

With the home team having higher Gradings in 4 of the strings, the match was always going to be in their favour. This turned out to be the case with a Home win.

It was the number 3 String which turned out to be the most competitive, with the Players battling out over a total of 140 Points ! Victory finally going to the Home Player and Player of the match, Olly BOOTLE.

If the Away No. 5 player, James Kearney, had not had to withdraw after 3 game(s) the result could have been closer.